MSM Madness
Dear News Agencies
Submitted by IrnBru001 on Wed, 07/25/2007 - 15:02.I don't want to go to your poorly designed, ad ridden, ajax ruined websites. I want to read your news by RSS. I want to READ your news via rss, not just read the title and the first sentence.
I'm sure you do this to try and force us back to your site so you can bombard us with ads. Let me explain something to you. I, like most smart internet users, use AdBlock, so I never see your annoying ads. Second I'll use a different news source's RSS if you keep your crappy format.
See I don't need you anymore. Information is no longer in the strangle hold of the MSM. There are 1000's of news sources who will filter out your corporatist crap and present me only what I want in my news, information!
See I don't support you because, well honestly I think you suck and have long out lasted your usefulness.
In other words, change or be chastised.
I too am Spartacus
Submitted by IrnBru001 on Sun, 02/18/2007 - 08:00.The Edwards blogger thing is unfortunate. I'm a big fan of Pandagon, I even tried to write their wikipedia entry, but some rightwing-nuts deleted it.
Haven't read Shakespears's Sister as much but I've enjoyed what I've read.
I think its clear the media is at fault here. As long as they consider conservative talking points news worthy this stuff is going to happen.
What I'm not so clear about is how to feel about Edwards campaign. I mean they should have had a better understanding of the blogosphere before hiring bloggers. Pandagon is very unapologetic, snarky, and honest about their views. That is what has made Pandagon such a great blog.
It is clear that the public and the media still isn't ready to "take the gloves off" when dealing with the topic of religion. They still want to treat it as special and unquestionable. That is too bad.
Until we are able to discuss and criticize these institutions openly and critically, those who do question we be ostracized.
lefty said...
so, blogs just can't have wikipedia entries or just not ones from liberals?
what's the story there?
IrnBru001 said...
They can but the "rules" for entries about blogs are so subjective that unless it is a huge major blog they can be deleted by just a few people working together. While I think wikipedia is a great tool, some of the editorial rules don't make a lot of sense. Pandagon, even before this, was a pretty major blog, wining some awards, mentions by magazines and acknowledged by many major political orgs (which seemed to completely fulfill the requirements), but it takes only one person to start a "article for deletion" process and once moving its very hard to stop. It seems in retrospect I was totally right that it deserved an entry. : )
- IrnBru001's blog
- Login or register to post comments
More on the CNN story.
Submitted by IrnBru001 on Fri, 02/09/2007 - 08:00.Richard Dawkins is appearing on CNN in response to the outrage cause by the clip I referred to below.
He will be appearing on the Paula Zahn show Monday the 12th (which is Darwin Day btw) hopefully to give voice to our outrage. I believe he will be on the 8EST show.
Here is part of the horrendous segment, for those who are too lazy to click the other day's link : ).
- IrnBru001's blog
- Login or register to post comments
CNN's Bigotry
Submitted by IrnBru001 on Wed, 02/07/2007 - 08:00.Ever wonder why I feel secularism is an important topic?
Watch this video and you may understand
It goes from bad, seeing the plight of two couple, to worse, a network giving intolerance a soap box.
Watch this and try for a moment to wear my shoes.
Jenn of the Jungle said...
I have a "conservative" blog and blog talk radio show and have laid it out clearly that I am an atheist many times, and never had an issue with it. And no one's ever tried to convert me. In fact most of my commenters are very Christian. And still, no problems with it.
- IrnBru001's blog
- Login or register to post comments
The War on Christmas
Submitted by IrnBru001 on Sat, 12/02/2006 - 08:00.This stuff amuses me. I've never understood this extreme paranoia the right-wing has. This notion that they are a persecuted minority and that the big scary secular progressives are out to destroy America.
Though it doesn't seem as bad as it was last year, the talking heads are still talking about it.
From MediaMatters:
On the November 29 edition of his nationally syndicated radio show, Bill O'Reilly continued to hype the so-called "war" on Christmas by claiming that retailers Best Buy and Crate & Barrel are "still ordering their people not to say, 'Merry Christmas,' " and that the stores "will fire" employees who do. O'Reilly also asserted that "ordering" employees "not to say 'Merry Christmas' " is "the worst kind of fascism you could possibly have." In fact, representatives of both stores have denied having policies that forbid employees to say "Merry Christmas" to customers.
Inclusiveness is fascism?
If Billo had done any research, say called the stores for a clarification, he would have found the facts. But he of course doesn't want the facts he wants to feel persecuted. Wants to legitimize the paranoia of this listeners.
I can understand why he does it. It sells. There real question is "Why are the fundamentalists so paranoid that they buy it?"
theWatchList said...
It's always something. To be honest, the left has it's battles too.
This Happy Holidays thing is really really stupid though. Remember when we were younger and Happy Holidays just referred to that time towards the end of the year where we all pretended to be nice to each other (except the inlaws of course). It wasn't political and it wasn't a four letter word.
Everything is sitting behind some money driven agenda. O'Reilly can't not talk about it. Is FoxNews Friend John Gibson has that "War On Christmas" book out and they help each other promote books.
Benjamin Solah said...
I totally agree.
I think them portraying the idea that white Christians are some how a persecuted minority is just a ploy to drive racism against people of other cultures.
I really don't see Muslims getting upset over Christmas. My Muslim neighbour buys presents for his kids because he, like me being atheist, doesn't see it as a religious holiday and more a time of sharing and spending time with family.
The nutso Christians are just having a sook because no one wants to go to church anymore.
- IrnBru001's blog
- Login or register to post comments
"CNN's Dangerous Blowhard"
Submitted by IrnBru001 on Tue, 11/28/2006 - 08:00.Man is that an accurate title.
Glenn Beck is a CNN Headline News "anchor". I've disliked him for a while now. There are a lot of reasons not to like him. As Jeff Cohen at TomPaine.com says, Glenn Beck is "a loudmouthed, factually-challenged, occasionally funny know-it-all." He is of the O'Reilly mold, where facts don't count and you can win an argument by yelling louder.
Then there is the now infamous "Sir, prove to me that you are not working with our enemies." question he asked of representative elect Keith Ellison, the first Muslim elected to congress.
But the thing that really bothers me about him is that he always seems to be on! Wikipedia says his show airs nightly at 7:00 p.m. Eastern Time, repeating at 9:00 p.m. and 12:00 a.m.. That would explain why seems that every time I'm looking for news I run into him.
I guess I should stick to blogs.
CoolAqua said...
That would be a good point of testimony at the next FCC Media Consolidation Forum
From IrnBru001: "This is my favorite comment!"
Tony said...
I was trying to figure out this guy's name so I googled for CNN blowhard, and your post came up. :)
Thanks for the help.
- IrnBru001's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Recent comments
1 week 1 day ago
3 weeks 23 hours ago
3 weeks 2 days ago
1 year 3 weeks ago
1 year 4 weeks ago
1 year 4 weeks ago
1 year 4 weeks ago
1 year 4 weeks ago
1 year 5 weeks ago
1 year 6 weeks ago