I too am Spartacus
The Edwards blogger thing is unfortunate. I'm a big fan of Pandagon, I even tried to write their wikipedia entry, but some rightwing-nuts deleted it.
Haven't read Shakespears's Sister as much but I've enjoyed what I've read.
I think its clear the media is at fault here. As long as they consider conservative talking points news worthy this stuff is going to happen.
What I'm not so clear about is how to feel about Edwards campaign. I mean they should have had a better understanding of the blogosphere before hiring bloggers. Pandagon is very unapologetic, snarky, and honest about their views. That is what has made Pandagon such a great blog.
It is clear that the public and the media still isn't ready to "take the gloves off" when dealing with the topic of religion. They still want to treat it as special and unquestionable. That is too bad.
Until we are able to discuss and criticize these institutions openly and critically, those who do question we be ostracized.
lefty said...
so, blogs just can't have wikipedia entries or just not ones from liberals?
what's the story there?
IrnBru001 said...
They can but the "rules" for entries about blogs are so subjective that unless it is a huge major blog they can be deleted by just a few people working together. While I think wikipedia is a great tool, some of the editorial rules don't make a lot of sense. Pandagon, even before this, was a pretty major blog, wining some awards, mentions by magazines and acknowledged by many major political orgs (which seemed to completely fulfill the requirements), but it takes only one person to start a "article for deletion" process and once moving its very hard to stop. It seems in retrospect I was totally right that it deserved an entry. : )
- IrnBru001's blog
- Login or register to post comments


Recent comments
1 year 16 weeks ago
1 year 17 weeks ago
1 year 17 weeks ago
1 year 17 weeks ago
1 year 17 weeks ago
1 year 18 weeks ago
1 year 19 weeks ago
1 year 22 weeks ago
1 year 25 weeks ago
1 year 26 weeks ago