Clear Channel Helps Wal-Mart Hide its Devastating Business Practices
There is a new twist in Campaign for America's Future’s Wal-Mart slogan campaign. Clear Channel, the owner of the billboard on which the winning Wal-Mart slogan was to go, has rejected the billboard content. The CAF email is below and it explains what happened.
The winning billboard slogan is Wal-Mart: Killing Local Businesses One Main Street at a Time. Rejecting the ideal of free market capitalism, as well as freedom of speech, Clear Channel decided to side with the interests of cronyism and partisanship once again to deny the Campaign for America's Future’s billboard.
Clear Channel doesn’t get much text on the blogosphere and I think that should change. Clear Channel, as you may know, makes no efforts to hide its political and corporate bias. The example are numerous (link , link , link , link) Its also has close ties to the republican party including holding "patriotic rallies" which in fact were little more then pro-bush rallies. source In the 2004 election Clear Channel gave “$42,200 to Bush, vs. $1,750 to likely Democratic nominee John Kerry”. Worse yet is that Clear Channel’s “executives and Clear Channel's political action committee gave 77% of their $334,501 in federal contributions to Republicans. That's a bigger share than any other entertainment company….” source . Would it also surprise you that on 12.06.2004 the AP press reported that Clear Channel starting using Fox News Radio as its “primary source of national news”?
Clear Channel is a shining example of the money hungry, biased MSM, and it time we start talking about it.
The email:
Dear IrnBru001,
Clear Channel Censors the Truth about Wal-Mart!
After allowing us to reserve a billboard less than a mile from Wal-Mart’s World HQ, Clear Channel has refused to accept our ad, censoring the message that you selected about Wal-Mart. Bob Sadler, Clear Channel’s Fort Smith, Ark., division president, unilaterally made the decision. To try to rationalize his censorship, he forwarded a copy of Clear Channel’s official content review policy which stated:
"I wish I could offer objective guidelines for reviewing copy, but I can’t. Frankly, I think these kinds of issues need to be viewed the way Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart approached a very controversial pornography case many years ago: "You know it when you see it."
This is outrageous. Our ad isn’t pornography. It is a clear statement of the truth about Wal-Mart. Mr. Sadler is suppressing free speech out of fear of offending Wal-Mart.
Clear Channel owns more billboards than any other company in America and over 1,200 radio stations nationwide. It is simply outrageous that they would use this power to suppress speech -- even a message that we are prepared to pay for. We have to let Clear Channel know that their censorship is unacceptable. Please send an email to Bob Sadler, the man who rejected your billboard, and demand that he not suppress speech to placate Wal-Mart.
http://www.ourfuture.org/No_Censorship.cfm
Clear Channel has a distinct right-wing political bias. Right after the 2004 elections when emotions were still running high, Clear Channel sponsored a billboard with an image of President Bush next to the words “Our Leader.” In addition, the company’s political action committee gave 75% of its donations to Republicans from 2000-2002, and Clear Channel’s founder, Lowry Mays, a close friend of the Bush family, has donated tens of thousands of dollars to Republicans. [1]
Clear Channel executives are entitled to their own political views, but the company must not be allowed to suppress views that conflict with right-wing ideology on its billboards. Billboards are a public media. Clear Channel owns more of them than any other company. It cannot be allowed to leverage its ownership for partisan political purposes, or to suppress the truth.
The ability of a major communications corporation to censor information clearly infringes on the marketplace of ideas. One man, Bob Sadler, has claimed the license to silence our voice. Please, send him an email and demand that he support freedom of speech and tell him not to censor facts about Wal-Mart.
http://www.ourfuture.org/No_Censorship.cfm
As you know, “Wal-Mart: Killing Local Businesses One Main Street at a Time” isn’t just rhetoric, it's reality. Within the first five years of Wal-Mart’s arrival in nearly 1,800 U.S. counties, an average of four small businesses, one mid-sized store and one large store go out of business. [2] And, rather than generating substantial new business, Wal-Mart takes 84% of its business from existing stores, closing down stores on Main Streets across America. [3]
No one censors Wal-Mart’s multi-million dollar ad campaigns. No one stops Wal-Mart from painting its workers as happy, without noting that they are paid so little that most can’t afford health care for their kids.
Wal-Mart’s market power should not be able to suppress the truth. The billboard we submitted is grounded in fact -- facts the American people and Wal-Mart executives need to know. Please, send an email to Bob Sadler and tell him that the message on our billboard isn’t just rhetoric, it’s a harsh reality that needs to be exposed and corrected.
http://www.ourfuture.org/No_Censorship.cfm
We pledge to you that Clear Channel will not stop us from getting your message out. We are now pursuing legal options against Clear Channel. In addition, we’re going to develop alternatives to take the message that Clear Channel censored across the country. We’re going to enlist more allies in challenging Clear Channel and in getting this important message out. Please, forward this email to friends and family, point out this injustice and encourage them to take action in this first step of that effort.
http://www.ourfuture.org/No_Censorship.cfm
Thank you so much for all you do.
Sincerely,
Robert L. Borosage, Co-Director
Campaign for America's Future[1] G.R. Anderson Jr., “Clear Channel Rules the World.” City Pages. Vol. 26, Issue 1263, February 16, 2005.
[2] Emek Basker, "Job Creation or Destruction? Labor-Market Effects of Wal-Mart Expansion", By , University of Missouri, Review of Economics & Statistics, February 2005, http://www.missouri.edu/~baskere/papers/
[3] Thomas Muller and Elizabeth Humstone, "What Happened When Wal-Mart Came to Town? A Report on Three Iowa Communities with a Statistical Analysis of Seven Iowa Counties", National Trust For Historic Preservation, 1996. Quoted in "Store Wars," PBS http://www.pbs.org/itvs/storewars/chat_transcript.html
- IrnBru001's blog
- Login to post comments

